The Audit The Fed Bill Gets Passed By The House But Obama And The Democrats Are Going To Kill It

On Wednesday, Ron Paul's bill to audit the Federal Reserve was overwhelmingly passed by the U.S. House of Representatives.  The vote was 327 to 98.  You would think that a bill with such overwhelming support would easily become law.  But it won't, because Barack Obama and the Democrats plan to kill it.  Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has already said that the Senate will not even consider the bill.  But of course if Barack Obama called Harry Reid and told him that he wants this bill to get through the Senate so that he could sign it then Harry Reid would be singing a much different tune.  Sadly, we all know that is not going to happen.  Barack Obama's good buddy Ben Bernanke called the Audit the Fed bill a "nightmare scenario" last week, and Obama is certainly not going to do anything to upset Bernanke - especially this close to the election.  Obama needs Bernanke to do everything that he possibly can to stimulate the economy so that Obama will look as good as possible in November.  The sad truth is that there is absolutely no chance that the Audit the Fed bill will become law and that is a crying shame.

So why is an audit of the Federal Reserve so important?

Why does Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke consider an audit of the Federal Reserve to be a "nightmare scenario" that must be avoided at all costs?

Well, perhaps it is because there has never been a true comprehensive audit of the Federal Reserve since it was created back in 1913.

The Federal Reserve has more power over the economy than anyone else in the country does, and yet they are virtually unaccountable and the American people have very little idea what has been going on behind closed doors over at the Fed for the past 100 years.

A very limited audit of the Fed that was passed a couple of years ago that examined transactions during the last financial crisis discovered that the Federal Reserve had actually loaned out more than 16 trillion dollars in nearly interest-free money to the "too big to fail" banks between 2007 and 2010.

Keep in mind that U.S. GDP for the entire year of 2011 was only slightly more than 15 trillion dollars.

The Federal Reserve loaned out trillions upon trillions of dollars to their friends and never told the American people about it.


You would think that Congress would be quite eager to see what else has been going on over at the Federal Reserve.

But instead, many Democrats are completely and utterly opposed to auditing the Fed any further.

U.S. Representative Barney Frank (a Democrat) seemed to regard the bill as a joke even after it overwhelmingly passed in the House.  Frank stated that "nobody here thinks this will ever become law".

According to Politico, there is zero chance that the bill will get through the U.S. Senate....

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has said the Senate will not consider the bill, effectively killing its chances of becoming law.

But we all know that if Obama wanted this bill to become law that it would be a done deal.

If Barack Obama came out tomorrow in front of the television cameras and declared his support for this bill it would sail right through the Senate.

Unfortunately, the Obama administration has made it very clear that it considers a comprehensive audit of the Federal Reserve to be a really, really bad idea.

For example, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner once stated that auditing the Fed is a "line that we don’t want to cross" and that if we did audit the Fed it would be "problematic for the country".

So what exactly did he mean by that?

That is a very good question.

In any event, people should take this as an opportunity to confront Barack Obama about the Audit the Fed bill wherever he goes.

Perhaps Obama will prove me wrong.

Perhaps Obama will show that he is willing to stand up to the Federal Reserve.

In fact, if Obama gets this bill pushed through Congress and signs it into law, I will not criticize him for an entire month.

But we all know that will never happen.

The Federal Reserve is going to be able to continue to keep their secrets hidden from the American people.

The following is what Ron Paul had to say following the vote on Wednesday....

"I think the whole idea that they can deal in trillions of dollars and know that nobody is allowed to ask them a question is a moral hazard."

And Ron Paul is right.

If the Federal Reserve can zap trillions of dollars into existence out of thin air and loan that money to their friends at the big banks and to central banks in other countries, then it should not be too much to ask them to be accountable to the American people.

Over the coming months, the American people will heatedly debate whether Barack Obama or Mitt Romney would be better for the U.S. economy.

But the truth is that the Federal Reserve has far more power over the U.S. economy than the president of the United States does.

The Federal Reserve has been called the "fourth branch of government" because of how much power it has.  The Federal Reserve sets our interest rates, it determines the level of our money supply, it regulates and secretly bails out our banks, it determines the "target rates" for unemployment and inflation, and every small move the Fed makes causes global financial markets to swing wildly.

The Federal Reserve does all of this without ever having to be accountable to the American people.  In fact, whenever a bill is introduced that would shed some light on their activities they whine and cry about how important their "independence" is.

In a previous article, I described how preposterous this all is....

For a moment, imagine that there is a privately-owned organization in the United States that can create U.S. dollars out of thin air whenever it wants and can loan that money to whoever it wants to.  Imagine that this organization is able to act with the full power of the U.S. government behind it, but that nobody in the organization is ever elected by the American people, and that for all practical purposes the organization is not accountable to the president or to Congress.  Imagine that the organization is able to make trillions of dollars of secret loans to banks, to foreign governments and even to their close friends without ever having to face a comprehensive audit.  Does that sound preposterous?  Well, such an organization actually exists.

The American people need to stand up and demand an audit of the Federal Reserve.

We deserve to know what is going on over there.

Sadly, the mainstream media makes it sound as if hell has a better chance of freezing over than this bill does of becoming law.  The following is from a USA Today article that was posted on Wednesday....

The bill stands no chance of becoming law because the Democratic-controlled Senate will not take it up. The vote, however, served as a symbolic swan song for Paul, who is not seeking re-election. It is also an indicator of how Paul's economic views have gone more mainstream, particularly within the Republican Party, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis that shook Americans' confidence in Wall Street and the federal government.

Well, let us hope that this kind of a bill keeps getting introduced in Congress.

Perhaps someday we actually will get a real audit of the Federal Reserve.

When that happens, the following is a list of questions that I would like to see asked by those auditing the Fed....

If the Federal Reserve is supposed to prevent shocks to our economy, then why have there been 10 different economic recessions since 1950 and why are we about to enter another one?

Was the Federal Reserve involved in the manipulation of Libor?

What role did the Federal Reserve playing in creating the housing bubble that resulted in an unprecedented housing crash?

Why has the value of the U.S. dollar fallen by 83 percent since 1970?

Why is the Federal Reserve paying U.S. banks not to lend money?

Why did Barack Obama nominate Ben Bernanke for a second term as head of the Federal Reserve when Bernanke has a track record of failure that makes the Chicago Cubs look like a roaring success?

Why is the U.S. national debt more than 5000 times larger than it was when the Federal Reserve was created in 1913?

Why were the Federal Reserve and the personal income tax both pushed through Congress in the same year in 1913?

Why does the Federal Reserve argue that it is "not an agency" of the federal government in court?

Why do all 187 nations that belong to the IMF have a central bank?

Do you have any other questions that you would like to have asked during an audit of the Federal Reserve?  Please feel free to post a comment with your thoughts below....

5 comments for “The Audit The Fed Bill Gets Passed By The House But Obama And The Democrats Are Going To Kill It

  1. July 25, 2012 at 10:17 pm

    I’m afraid you don’t really understand macro economics, Mr. Snyder. Or why the central bank plays such a key role in economic policy, specifically monetary policy. I’ve taken but one year in high school of AP Economics, and while that certainly doesn’t qualify me to dictate any particular solution to our slow economy right now or exactly why job growth and the private sector are stagnate or how to solve the debt crisis, I can tell you why the Fed should NOT be subjected to an extensive audit or a permanent review committee like Ron Paul’s “Audit the Fed” bill proposes. And the reason is simple: the Fed needs to be autonomous.

    The Fed’s goal, the goal of any central bank and the dream of every economist, is to both prevent inflation and to lower unemployment by promoting economic growth. It does this by controlling interest rates for lending, monitoring banks, and manipulating the supply of money (it could also control reserve requirements, but that tool isn’t usually used). Contrary to what many Ron Paul and Audit the Fed supporters seem to think, the Fed DOES NOT and HAS NEVER “created money out of thin air.” Yes, it prints currency, but that is not how it manipulates supply of currency. Just printing more money whenever you wanted to would lead to massive inflation, which makes prices skyrocket, makes financial systems unstable, and increases the gap between the rich and the poor by effectively devaluing the dollar. When manipulating currency to promote growth and investment, the Fed buys bonds to give money to bond holders from its coffers, which leaves those bond holders more cash to invest with. It also will decrease the Discount Rate (how much a loan from the fed costs in interest to a bank), which allows lenders easier access to cash and encourages them to lower their own interest rates, making cash more easily available to investors to start businesses and create jobs, and for individuals to purchase goods like houses. However, increasing the money supply through these means creates inflation. Because if everyone has easy access to cash, then businesses can charge more since there’s more money to go around, which is why this kind of expansive monetary policy is only used during recession, when inflation is already low and job growth is needed. In times of growth after the economy has recovered, in order to prevent inflation, the Fed will instead hike up interest rates and sell bonds, making cash less accessible for lenders and investors and individuals, and taking bills out of the supply of money so that prices will be stable, because if there’s less money to go around, businesses can’t charge as much.

    Now, it is certainly true that the Fed does possess a lot of power and is free from many measures of scrutiny by Congress and other financial institutions. But that doesn’t make it corrupt. It is still subject to review on occasion to ensure there are no illegal back deals going on. Plus, the president has control over the appointment of the Fed’s chair, and thus can remotely monitor the insider activities of the Fed should anything suspicious happen.

    The reason for the degree of independence the Fed has is so that politicians and political games cannot influence economic policy and wantonly abuse tools as powerful as the Fed’s, ESPECIALLY during election time (imagine how easy it would be to win if you could proclaim that your party was responsible for making money and loans easy to get, letting you keep your home! [while of course ignoring the staggering inflation that results]). Subjecting the Fed to a permanent review committee like Paul proposes would put it at the mercy of Congress, because they could dictate how the Fed operates. The Fed needs to operate fast and independently in order for its measures to be effective; most usually take around six months already to filter through markets and have a visible effect on the economy. This is the “nightmare scenario” Bernake projected; Congress putting the economy and the welfare of citizens at risk for the sake of some votes. This is why members of the Senate won’t allow this bill to pass.

    • promisberg
      July 26, 2012 at 9:43 pm

      Nice Keynsian delusion.

      Nice double speak too. The fed has in fact caused massive devaluation to the US dollar sense it’s inception. Has in fact caused massive transfer of wealth from the lower and middle classes to the top – it is by design. Perhaps you need to study the history of fiat currencies and historic motivation of central banking.

      You sound like a fed puppet.


    • Beverly Settlemyre
      July 27, 2012 at 11:25 am

      I’m sorry, Morgan. I don’t usually resort to name calling but you are severely ignorant if you think that the Federal Reserve isn’t corrupt. I don’t know what in the blazes your economics class taught you, but to believe that the FED doesn’t “print money out of thin air” is just foolish and asinine. The money they’re printing is no longer backed by gold or silver, there is no checks and balances for how much they can and DO print, and the American people are paying outrageous and criminal interest rates on money that we never see (aka gets secretly loaned to banks/corporations for bail outs, etc.).

      The ONLY reason that slime Ben Bernanke would think a full audit of the FED would be a “nightmare scenario” would be because the wool would be removed from the eyes of the world, and that atrocious privately owned company would be exposed for the plague it is. Thinking about Bernanke, Rothschild, Greenspan, Rockefeller… all of them just make me sick to my stomach. “Conspiracy” theories aside, they have managed to monopolize major currency systems at the expense of the middle class and impoverished citizens, whilst being at the mercy of NONE. NO ONE should have that kind of power, not any person, company, government, or otherwise.

      Your strong defense for this vile syndicate makes me question your moral character, but hey… what do I know? I’m just the gal getting overtaxed and reamed with unjust inflation rates on every purchase I make, suffering at the hands of the sickly and corrupt individuals who are trying to mass control the population. No biggie, right?

  2. July 26, 2012 at 2:55 am

    Why do the American people not file suit in federal court about federal reserve notes being counterfeit? Article 1 section 8 paragraph 5 “The Congress shall have Power To:… To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin” and Article 1 Section 10 “No State shall…make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts” Seems quite obvious that the Fed is unconstitutional. At the very least, THE CONGRESS SHALL HAVE THE POWER TO COIN MONEY.

  3. John
    July 26, 2012 at 7:18 am

    “In fact, if Obama gets this bill pushed through Congress and signs it into law, I will not criticize him for an entire month.” Can you be much, much more specific about what Obama has to do to meet your criteria? Does this go into effect under any and all scenarios that end with Obama signing the bill into law, or does he have to take an active roll in pushing this through the Senate? If so, please define that active roll in clear, measurable terms.

Leave a Reply